Don't worry this robot is TOTALLY useless
and has been defective since its creation;
its intelligence is barely measureable.
The following is my response to an article at this link:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/18/ibm-synapse-chips-human-brain_n_930161.html
I guarantee the elite class will make sure the artificial intelligence is closely monitored to insure their continued control over us. However; if a terrorist orginzation got a hold of these technological abominations they could use them as a new way to scare the masses into thinking the terminator movie was propehtic These "terrorists organizzations" will stop at nothing to control us and our freedom so what bettter way then building on fear already implanted in our psyche by hollywood to further confuse and divide. I mean the same could be said about aliens attacking earth; we have been continously conditioned into thinking it has a possibility of really happening. Hollywood has manufactured fear by spinning fictional stories into realistic portrayals further distoring our view of reality. I mean its hard to know if they did this intentionally or accidentally but it definitely is a fact which is hard to argue. Maybe terrorists will take technology and make us beleive God has returned and use wonders of technology we are unaware of to make us beleivers in the deception.
This article's purpose is to make us step back in awe at the wonders of science and its advances in technology. I think the oppossite is true though since it only benefits a small few while limiting liberty for the rest of us. I mean the article is speaking about centralizing control of human function under a super computer which will eventually be more intelligent then the human brain. I fail to see why we should look at this with anything but disgust for the way science is able operate with huge amounts of money without adhering to any ethical standard. Its crazy! What did the scientists do in Germany in WW2? Did they follow any standards of morality when continuing to pursue technological advancements? Why isn't this article speaking out about how wrong it is to allow the science community to operate without any limiitations or rules?”
No comments:
Post a Comment